Exploring ESG Perceptions through Firm Demographics: A Quantitative Study in V4 SMEs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62222/qrjznz47Keywords:
ESG, SMEs, firm demographics, V4, sectoral differencesAbstract
Research background: ESG principles are increasingly integral to corporate strategy, particularly within the European Union. While large corporations often have the capacity to meet ESG requirements, SMEs face structural limitations. In the context of the V4 countries, there is limited empirical evidence on how firm demographics influence ESG perception and implementation.
Purpose of the article: The article aims to analyze how firm size, sector, and business duration shape SMEs’ perceptions of ESG and its three pillars. The study seeks to quantify these relationships and provide insights into demographic determinants of ESG alignment.
Methods: A quantitative survey was conducted in February 2024 using the CAWI method across SMEs in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland. A total of 1,320 responses were collected and evaluated using correlation analysis and linear regression modelling. ESG attitudes were measured on a 5-point Likert scale, and statistical tests were conducted at a 5% significance level.
Findings & Value added: Firm size, sector, and age were statistically significant predictors of ESG perception, though the explained variance was modest. Larger firms showed consistently stronger alignment with ESG—particularly in environmental and social dimensions—while older firms expressed lower support, possibly due to legacy constraints. Sectoral differences were most notable in environmental and governance perceptions, with manufacturing firms demonstrating higher engagement. Governance was less sensitive to firm demographics, suggesting it may be perceived as a baseline compliance requirement. The findings highlight the need for differentiated ESG frameworks and support mechanisms tailored to SMEs’ capacities and sectoral contexts. This study contributes to ESG literature by offering new evidence from the V4 region and suggesting policy directions for more inclusive sustainability practices.
Downloads
References
1. Acar, G., Coskun A.: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and earnings management in telecommunication companies: an international perspective. Financial Internet Quarterly, 2023, 19 (2), pp. 26-35
2. Alduais, F. (2023), “Unravelling the intertwined nexus of firm performance, ESG practices, and capital cost in the Chinese business landscape”, Cogent Economics & Finance, 11:2, 2254589.
3. Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023), “ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 195 (2023) 122806.
4. Ayuso, S., & Navarrete-Báez, F. E. (2018). How Does Entrepreneurial and International Orientation Influence SMEs’ Commitment to Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from Spain and Mexico. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.1441
5. Bak, I., Ziolo, M., Cheba, K., & Spoz, A. (2022). Environmental, social and governance factors in companies’ business models and the motives of incorporated them in the core business. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(4), 837-855. https://doi.org/10.3846/JBEM.2022.16207
6. Belás, J., Damborský, M., Metzker, Z., & Šuleř, P. (2021). Perception of Selected Strategic Management Factors of SME in V4 Countries. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.5937/SJM16-33274
7. Belás, J., Vojtovič, S., & Ključnikov, A. (2016). Microenterprises and Significant Risk Factors in Loan Process. & Sociology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14254/2071
8. Betakova, J., Pietrzak, M. B., & Igliński, B. (2023). Effect of demographic characteristics of enterprises on the implementation of corporate social responsibility in SMEs context. Journal of Business Sectors, 01(01), 53-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62222/XQKO8567
9. Bifulco, G. M., Savio, R., Paolone, F., & Tiscini, R. (2023). The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3231-3241. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2549
10. Cardillo, G., Bendinelli, E., & Torluccio, G. (2022). COVID-19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy Environment, 32:602-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3163
11. Chouaibi, S., Rossi, M., Siggia, D., & Chouaibi, J. (2022), “Exploring the Moderating Role of Social and Ethical Practices in the Relationship between Environmental Disclosure and Financial Performance: Evidence from ESG Companies”, Sustainability, 14, 209.
12. Dumitrescu, A., Gil-Bazo, J., & Zhou, F. (2022). Defining Greenwashing. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4098411
13. Dzomonda, O. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Commitment and Access to Finance by Small and Medium Enterprises: The Role of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 8863, 14(14), 8863. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14148863
14. Corporate sustainability reporting - European Commission. (2024). from https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en
15. Fu, T., & Li. J. (2023), “An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: the moderating role of digital transformation”, Front. Environ. Sci., 11:1256052.
16. Garrido-Ruso, M., Otero-González, L., López-Penabad, M. C., & Santomil, P. D. (2024). Does ESG implementation influence performance and risk in SMEs? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2783
17. Gholami, A., Murray, P. A., & Sands, J. (2022). Environmental, Social, Governance & Financial Performance Disclosure for Large Firms: Is This Different for SME Firms? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106019
18. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
19. Gjergji, R., Vena, L., Sciascia, S., & Cortesi, A. (2021). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosure on the cost of capital in small and medium enterprises: The role of family business status. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2647
20. Gu, Y., Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2023), “Audit 4.0-based ESG assurance: An example of using satellite images on GHG emissions”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50, 100625.
21. Habib, A. M. (2023), “Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model”, Heliyon, 9, e17847.
22. Hazbi, F. E. L., & Mounir, Y. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and Environmental performance: The mediation role of Technology Innovation. E3S Web of Conferences, 412, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202341201009
23. Homroy, S., Mavruk T., Van Diem, N.: ESG-Linked Compensation, CEO Skills, and Shareholder Welfare. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2023, 1-47
24. Shalhoob, H., & Hussainey, K. (2023a). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure and the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Sustainability Performance. Sustainability, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15010200
25. Khalil, M. A., & Nimmanunta, K. (2023). Conventional versus green investments: advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(3), 1153-1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822
26. Khan, K. A., Vishwakarma, R. K., Akhtar, M. A., & Hoang, H. (2023). A sectoral perspective on the sustainable growth of SMEs. Empirical research in the V4 countries. Journal of Business Sectors, 01(01), 10-19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62222/CVFW6962
27. Kot, S. (2023), “Development insights on supply chain management in small and medium-sized enterprises”, Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
28. Lee, H. J., & Rhee, T. (2023), “How Does Corporate ESG Management Affect Consumers’ Brand Choice?” Sustainability, 15, 6795.
29. Lei, X., & Yu, J. (2024). Striving for sustainable development: Green financial policy, institutional investors, and corporate ESG performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1177-1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2630
30. Liu, M., Luo, X., & Lu, W. Z. (2023), “Public perceptions of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) based on social media data: Evidence from China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 135840.
31. Machova, R., Korcsmaros, E., Csereova, A., & Varga, J. (2023). Innovation activity of Slovak ICT SMEs. Journal of Business Sectors, 01(01), 32-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62222/HTPI2054
32. Mandal, S., & Mitra, S. (2023). Investors’ Perception of their Investment Decision on the Basis of ESG – A Case Study in Kolkata. Asian Journal of Management, 14(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5763.2023.00045
33. Narula, R., Rao, P., Akshat, & Rao, A. (2023). Impact of ESG on firm value: a conceptual review of the literature. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 1, 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00267-8
34. Ozkan, S., Romagnoli, S., & Rossi, P. (2023). A novel approach to rating SMEs’ environmental performance: Bridging the ESG gap. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111151. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.111151
35. Ronalter, L. M., Bernardo, M., & Romaní, J. M. (2022). Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 9067-9109. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-022-02425-0
36. Sahin, O., Karoline Bax, K., Paterlini, S., Czado, C.: The pitfalls of (non-definitive) Environmental, Social, and Governance scoring methodology. Global Finance Journal 2023, 56, 100780.
37. Shalhoob, H., & Hussainey, K. (2023a). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure and the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Sustainability Performance. Sustainability, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15010200
38. Skousen, C. J., & Sun, L. (2019). Do employee dimension ratings reflect employee performance? Evidence from MSCI’s ESG database. Applied Economics Letters, 26(14), 1182-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1540843
39. Todaro, D. L., & Torelli, R. (2024). From greenwashing to ESG-washing: A focus on the circular economy field. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2786
40. Tsang, Y. P., Fan, Y., & Feng, Z. P. (2023), Bridging the gap: Building environmental, social and governance capabilities in small and medium logistics companies, Journal of Environmental Management, 338, 117758.
41. Vannoni, V., & Ciotti, E. (2020). Esg or Not Esg? A Benchmarking Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(8), 152. https://doi.org/10.5539/IJBM.V15N8P152
42. Wang, L., & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48636-x
43. Yoo, H. M., Kang, J. H., Lee, S. J., Jang, S. H., Yoon, Y. S., & Kang, Y. (2024). Effect analysis on waste recycling by introducing a new policy, “Environmental Assessment of Recycling,” for establishment of the ESG management system in the Republic of Korea. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/IEAM.4896
44. Yu, E. P., Luu, B. Van, & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2020.101192
45. Zeng, L., & Jiang, X. (2023). ESG and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Agriculture and Forestry Listed Companies. Sustainability, 15(8), 6723. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15086723
46. Zhang, C., & Jin, S. (2022). What Drives Sustainable Development of Enterprises? Focusing on ESG Management and Green Technology Innovation. Sustainability, 14(18), 11695. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU141811695
47. Zhou, M., Govindan, K., & Xie, X. (2020). How fairness perceptions, embeddedness, and knowledge sharing drive green innovation in sustainable supply chains: An equity theory and network perspective to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 120950. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.120950
48. Hu, J., Zou, & Qianqian Yin, Q. (2023), Research on the effect of ESG performance on stock price synchronicity: Empirical evidence from China’s capital markets, Finance Research Letters 55, 103847.
49. Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). Esg importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC7020127
50. Zhu, J., & Huang, F. (2023). Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China. Sustainability, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15075756
51. Zvarikova, K., Dvorsky, J., Belas, J. Jr., & Metzker, Z. (2024). Model of Sustainability of SMEs in V4 Countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.3846/JBEM.2024.20729
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS SECTORS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/html/ojs/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68
